This is a great illustration of the difference between "works" and Works. This implementation is unsettling to me, while the original Path version is pleasant.

This is a great illustration of the difference between "works" and Works. This implementation is unsettling to me, while the original Path version is pleasant. It's hard to pin down - they're very close. (I think it's the animation speed and rapidly spinning icons mostly.) As someone put it in another post it's the difference between the works of Google/Microsoft et. al. and the Works of Apple, Path, etc. The former would see this and sign off - "it works" like we specified, while at latter, this would be a good first pass and then "make 10 refinements" to get it to "feel" right. No offense Beau, I'm just using yours as an example.