4 ms·

> Apple has a lot more data than just a list of devices. [...] Of course. That is not the point here.

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• echelon 4y ago
  Perhaps you'd be better convinced with a service breakdown. Breaking monoliths into service boundaries yields easier ownership, maintenance, migration, and resilience. One "tiny" company with a few verticals can be comprised of thousands of microservices, each handling their own dedicated objective. Authentication, reverse proxy, API gateway, SMS, email, customer list, marketing email gateway, CMS for marketers on product X, feature flags, transaction histories, GDPR compliance handling, billing intelligence, various risk models, offline ML risk enrichment, etc. etc. Each will have its own data needs and replication / availability needs. This Apple number might seem crazy, but I'm not phased by it. I can picture it.
  • tpmx 4y ago
    I can also picture it, but not really in the way you're outlining it. It's a sad and very inefficient picture though. Apple does not need this this much data processing. It's a grotesque amount per device. My most positive plausible interpretation is that maybe they're just wasting insane amounts of energy doing lots and lots doing of stupid analytics, as one tends to do.
    • echelon 4y ago
      Sometimes things have to be built as layered abstractions in order for humans to reason about them at scale. See also the natural stochastic gradient ascent that produced our crazy complicated metabolic pathways (and all of biology).
    • threeseed 4y ago
      > It's a grotesque amount per device Again. It is not just for device data. There are backend services which your device interacts with e.g. Maps, Siri, Weather.