3 ms·
Well, the content can’t be free ultimately. It costs money to make the stuff. I honestly would be happy to pay 2 or 3x the cost to watch without ads.
by i_like_apis 4y ago
Well, the content can’t be free ultimately. It costs money to make the stuff. I honestly would be happy to pay 2 or 3x the cost to watch without ads.
- eftychis 4y agoNot true unfortunately, as youtube, tv series and movies have shown, there is product placement that is huge/at least substantial. Do you wanna know if a character is not the killer/bad guy? He is not using an iPhone.
- PenguinCoder 4y agoCosts money to make but doesn't cost near what the "accounting" shows. There's no reason why actors should get literal millions of dollars per gig.
- swores 4y agoSurely capitalism, and more specifically demand, is the reason? If the current companies paying them millions of dollars per gig say "sorry, we decided we don't like ads and don't want to charge our viewers more, so forget the millions we've now got a $200k offer for your next TV series season Mr Famous Actor" they'll take a job with the first company that once again offers them millions.
- scarface74 4y agoUnless you’re making minimum wage, I’m sure a lot of people would probably say the same thing about what you make.