4 ms·
If you believe he jumped to conclusions, I have a bridge to sell you. One doesn’t accidentally request to block indexing of their site. This was an intentional
by IAmGraydon 4y ago
If you believe he jumped to conclusions, I have a bridge to sell you. One doesn’t accidentally request to block indexing of their site. This was an intentional effort to spread conspiracy theories and he was caught red handed. He deserves to be put on trial for attempting to disrupt the democratic process.
- batch12 4y agoThrowing shade at a tech company, even though the whole thing has been proven untrue, is now worthy of being "put on trial"?
- gpm 4y agoI believe we call it "defamation"... (assuming, of course, that one can prove that on the balance of probabilities he knew that he had told Google not to index the site).
- batch12 4y agoGood point. I read "put on trial" for hurting democracy as a criminal trial. A civil suit filed by Google and ending up in court-- sure, I could see that.