> The tone of this article is cheap and overall it's terrible clickbait. Agreed, and what's worse to me is that it's all entirely speculative. The author didn'

> The tone of this article is cheap and overall it's terrible clickbait. Agreed, and what's worse to me is that it's all entirely speculative. The author didn't do any original research to, I dunno, email the guy's campaign about his website and ask if he made it? Having not done any research that didn't involve reading Twitter, he decided it was okay to write an article about it, and just pad that article out with wild-ass guesses and invective.