3 ms·
> The fact that he released the first genesis block on 3rd January 2009 with the sentence of UK Times article is not casual. We can see from the first version o
by throw827474737 4y ago
> The fact that he released the first genesis block on 3rd January 2009 with the sentence of UK Times article is not casual. We can see from the first version of the source code that his network was ready many days before that date. Was he waiting for "fixing issues"? No, he ended up clearly with a release that contained many errors (e.g. amount created in genesis block can not be spent).
Sounds almost more like fair instead of a bug, but nommatter what, time going by between "finishing" and releasing is also more than normal on various levels for many reasons?!
> It's really weird to have both styles on codes, unless there are more people (>= 1) that work on the code or that reviews the code.
Hmm, no definitely no.. either just slacking, or even intentional to mark something?! Maybe you area very clean coder, I do this all the time if not polishing for work..
Could have been so, but deducting like those are proofs is very far fetched
.
- crecker 4y ago> Sounds almost more like fair instead of a bug, but nommatter what, time going by between "finishing" and releasing is also more than normal on various levels for many reasons?! I'm missing something: who says is not normal? Anyway regarding comments and that, the source code is clearly heavily edited and redacted, so I do agree that we can't extract much from comments. I did not understand why HN triggered so much about two/three/four slashes.