2 ms·
> Perhaps there would be other poor decisions made by the Hillary judges that mitigates the Roe v Wade decision. Sure. Bad stuff might happen no matter what ch
by tchaffee 4y ago
> Perhaps there would be other poor decisions made by the Hillary judges that mitigates the Roe v Wade decision.
Sure. Bad stuff might happen no matter what choices you make. You've described cynicism in a nutshell. That adds nothing to this conversation.
Progressive leaning judges do not have a history of taking away basic human rights. The reason people lost a basic human right that was protected for decades is because of a shift in the makeup of the Supreme Court. That shift happened due to who was elected as president. Which proves that elections and who you vote for does matter.
- cudgy 4y agoFine. Ignore the obvious point that picking a single matter that judges consider as a sole focus of efficacy contributes nothing to the conversation.