In my experience the wikipedia articles themselves are good, but the references unfortunately less so. Way too many newspaper-style sources, the academic papers

In my experience the wikipedia articles themselves are good, but the references unfortunately less so. Way too many newspaper-style sources, the academic papers range from 'the actual original paper on the topic' to 'obscure'. I wish articles had a section similar to the literature review in academic papers, that could raise the quality a lot. I think it'd need some nudging/template to get that somewhat consistent (like the boxes they have on many articles that are connected via a common theme, those are great).