3 ms·
The refutation is that projections are not evidence, and the actual evidence is... murky? At best? And at worst pokes some serious holes in the projections.
by AbrahamParangi 4y ago
The refutation is that projections are not evidence, and the actual evidence is... murky? At best? And at worst pokes some serious holes in the projections.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoThank you. It's the difference between actual events and events modeled in a simulation that assumes everything. Ex: If it there's a 2C rise, then it's 1-10% worse? What kind of garbage assessment is that? There's no way the error band doesn't also go negative for any value below 2C. Meaning the possible outcomes include reduction.