4 ms·
You say far more than any artist but I m not so sure. When we spend 20 years looking at stuff before doing one passably interesting work of art (bar absolute ou
by xwolfi 4y ago
You say far more than any artist but I m not so sure. When we spend 20 years looking at stuff before doing one passably interesting work of art (bar absolute outlying geniuses), it's not a small time nor a small training cost. It may feel easy for us but our brain never stop ingesting information for decades before being original enough.
- lostmsu 4y agoIt is impressive to me that the giant comment you replied to is factually wrong in one of its central premises about the amount of data consumed, and you are the one who gets negatives. Our vision alone uncompressed is about 13TB per hour (!) (assuming 8k per eye resolution, "full color", and about 20hz sample rate). By the time a kid knows to play with a color book, they saw an equivalent of 4 PB of imagery. For comparison Dall-E 2 only seen 175TB. And GPT-3 only a few TB.