> The problem with Scrum is that it usually works Aaaand right off the bat you've lost me. Define "works". If you mean it is a process and can be followed, su

> The problem with Scrum is that it usually works Aaaand right off the bat you've lost me. Define "works". If you mean it is a process and can be followed, sure, I guess? I would rather define it as "bullshit that keeps non technical people happy and in control". Despite the derogatory tone, I think that can have it's place. For example, engineers are generally terrible at selling their product, and knowing what end users actually want -- with non technical applications. So having "business people" run the show there is probably a good idea. Where it becomes unbearably moronic however, is when that happens at a supposedly tech company.