Ah but this is him defending himself after the fact. The book most definitely does create the "sufficient" impression, and deliberately, because it's such a nic

Ah but this is him defending himself after the fact. The book most definitely does create the "sufficient" impression, and deliberately, because it's such a nice story. This is attested to by the takeaways most people have from it. If they got the wrong impression, either he wrote it wrong or he's a shit writer - or both. Now he back pedals because he got called out on the bs. Don't get me wrong, he's a very good story teller. But he's a complete crap "popular science" writer