> Redhat decides to turn Ceph into yet another garbage storage product Is Ceph still a viable alternative in hardware and operational cost and reliability to H

> Redhat decides to turn Ceph into yet another garbage storage product Is Ceph still a viable alternative in hardware and operational cost and reliability to HDFS to store hundreds of PBs of data, if not EBs? I kept hearing people recommend Ceph over HDFS, but was unable to find examples of large deployment of Ceph for HDFS-like workload.