4 ms·
Not all content there is good. I see the pages on some political content, or in general a lot of content about country X (intentionally omitted) are of pretty p
by wobbly_bush 4y ago
Not all content there is good. I see the pages on some political content, or in general a lot of content about country X (intentionally omitted) are of pretty poor quality.
- mananaysiempre 4y ago... And at the same time, the English-language mathematics section is a fairly reliable and—in some cases—very broad reference, covering a range of viewpoints that would usually require trawling through half a dozen books for different subjects and target audiences. (It is rarely a good introduction, but then a single reference for a skilled reader is doable while a single introduction for every taste, background, and motivating problem is nigh-impossible.)
- bombcar 4y agoFor factual areas that don't change much Wikipedia can be exceptionally good. You're not likely to have a drawn-out edit war over a mathematical topic (I'm sure there are examples, but the final admin decision is likely to be "show both sides". Same with the census detail pages you find everywhere; they're probably accurate for that point in time, because nobody really cares.