Wikipedia's editorial policies result in the amplification and ossification of (political, academic, medical, etc.) establishment narratives and standards, whic

Wikipedia's editorial policies result in the amplification and ossification of (political, academic, medical, etc.) establishment narratives and standards, which are often corrupt for a wide variety of reasons. I'm not suggesting I have a silver bullet solution to this problem, but as a result I tend to disagree that Wikipedia is this holy grail of knowledge. That's only true for uncontroversial topics. For everything else, you have to find all the silenced users on the talk pages to learn about the real scope of a topic.