> You mean the smallest feature size. That is the word I am looking for. > That used to be the case until Samsung start playing around with the number a litt

> You mean the smallest feature size. That is the word I am looking for. > That used to be the case until Samsung start playing around with the number a little bit more for marketing, and the whole market force TSMC to follow, and after a few cycles we left with nothing but a name with numbers. Huh I didn't know that, does anyone publish min feature sizes for modern process nodes?.