4 ms·

Something about the whole freshdesk attitude really rubs me the wrong way. Not saying zendesk is in the right either. I just feel like I read the whole ripoffor

by shakes 15y ago

Something about the whole freshdesk attitude really rubs me the wrong way. Not saying zendesk is in the right either. I just feel like I read the whole ripoffornot page and cringe. Definitely doesn't seem like the type of company I would want to give my time or money. A couple people complained about their product on twitter and they built a whole page responding to it? In it, they respond to the criticism by making personal attacks against those who complained about them? Really weird. Stop starting flame wars, start making a decent product.

notjustanyone 15y ago
"A couple people complained about their product on twitter and they built a whole page responding to it?" The CEO of Zendesk made the comment "@benkepes you know what they say. Imitation is the sincerest from of WAIT-WHAT-A-FREAKING-RIP-OFF! ;)" Even if the allegation is correct, that is no way for a CEO to represent his company. Perhaps he should have contacted Freshdesk (privately) and told them if he thought there were trademark or patent issues, only bringing anything public if they refused to cooperate. If not, he probably should not have replied to the original comment at all.
mavelikara 15y ago
In an alternate universe it would look like they are complaining about personal attacks on them.
- shakes 15y ago
  Yeah, I think that's the problem with these kinds of flame wars. Is freshdesk right that the criticism about them was out of line? Yes. Does responding by saying the criticism "reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement" and "[criticizer should] exercise better judgement and ethics when making negative comments about a company" seem heavy-handed and just as ridiculous as the initial criticism? In my opinion, yes. I've had people call me every name in the book over my projects: a copy-cat, a sad and pathetic developer taking advantage of people and those are just a couple off the top of my head. Did I respond by calling those people ignorant or stupid or unethical? No. I just let it be. I feel good about what I'm doing and I keep trying to make products I'm proud of. Haters gonna hate.
  - true_religion 15y ago
    The full statement is: > Passing judgement on Product innovation based on the founder’s nationality reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement. They are complaining that nationalist insults or racist insults make the speaker look like an idiot. Is this ridiculous, heavy-handed, and unfair? Perhaps it is simply reflective of the fact that current culture looks down on racists.
    - shakes 15y ago
      Look, I hate racism. I grew up the midwest and saw the terrible things that racism can do to a culture. But my argument is, what does Freshdesk gain from going back and forth with @cloudgroupsyd? Beyond that, @cloudgroupsyd apologized but still they chose to bring up this quote to rabble-rouse and make personal attacks against him. We all say stupid stuff, we all make mistakes. Especially in this world of 140 characters or less. What more do they want the dude to do? Become a crusader for Freshdesk? Apologize to them in person? I'm a firm believer in forgiveness. Someone wrongs you and they apologize. What do you do? You move on. You don't write a blog post about.
      - Nrndr 15y ago
        He didn't apologized.
        shakes 15y ago
        Really? It looked to me like he did: http://twitter.com/#!/cloudgroupsyd/status/142539414374064128 http://twitter.com/#!/cloudgroupsyd/status/14253941437406412... You can argue if that apology was enough or if it was a full apology. But I feel like saying "he didn't apologize" is an oversimplification.
        j45 15y ago
        I don't know. There's no apology. Just a half assed explanation. Taking my english skills, calling someone an indian cowboy, is saying indians (posers) trying to be cowboys (the real deal). Literally, figuratively, metaphorically is definitely saying more than what it's not. And it's not positive. Instead of discussing facts, @cloudgroupsys' small mindedness to discuss and expose their ignorance (and what likely shows in many other things) simply, cannot, be overlooked.
mfjordvald 15y ago
How on earth did you get to freshdesk making personal attacks based on this page? I'm gobsmacked you managed to so severely misread the whole thing. The entire point of the page is to point out personal attacks made against them and then respond to the rip-off comment. Supposedly they did make a decent product already.
- shakes 15y ago
  My point is, they respond to the personal attacks by making personal attacks against the people who made them. An eye for an eye. In my opinion, they sunk down to the level of the people who were criticizing them. Making a good product speaks for itself, you don't have to have this petty back and forth.
  - chairface 15y ago
    Where are the personal attacks on that page? I see none.
    - shakes 15y ago
      Taking a tweet from someone with 73 followers, throwing it front of thousands of people (maybe more) and saying that the tweet "reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement" is a personal attack to me. You can argue that they're right, but does the punishment really fit the crime? It seems in poor judgement to publicly shame some dude who's comments would of otherwise gone unnoticed.
      - shadowsun7 15y ago
        The someone with 73 followers made a racist comment. Calling a competitor "indian cowbows" does reflect poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgment. Don't throw all the blame on the Freshdesk people. Everyone is responsible for what they say - and it appears to me that you're eager to let the 'someone with 73 followers' off the hook.

by shakes 15y ago

notjustanyone 15y ago

"A couple people complained about their product on twitter and they built a whole page responding to it?" The CEO of Zendesk made the comment "@benkepes you know what they say. Imitation is the sincerest from of WAIT-WHAT-A-FREAKING-RIP-OFF! ;)" Even if the allegation is correct, that is no way for a CEO to represent his company. Perhaps he should have contacted Freshdesk (privately) and told them if he thought there were trademark or patent issues, only bringing anything public if they refused to cooperate. If not, he probably should not have replied to the original comment at all.

mavelikara 15y ago

In an alternate universe it would look like they are complaining about personal attacks on them.

shakes 15y ago
Yeah, I think that's the problem with these kinds of flame wars. Is freshdesk right that the criticism about them was out of line? Yes. Does responding by saying the criticism "reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement" and "[criticizer should] exercise better judgement and ethics when making negative comments about a company" seem heavy-handed and just as ridiculous as the initial criticism? In my opinion, yes. I've had people call me every name in the book over my projects: a copy-cat, a sad and pathetic developer taking advantage of people and those are just a couple off the top of my head. Did I respond by calling those people ignorant or stupid or unethical? No. I just let it be. I feel good about what I'm doing and I keep trying to make products I'm proud of. Haters gonna hate.
- true_religion 15y ago
  The full statement is: > Passing judgement on Product innovation based on the founder’s nationality reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement. They are complaining that nationalist insults or racist insults make the speaker look like an idiot. Is this ridiculous, heavy-handed, and unfair? Perhaps it is simply reflective of the fact that current culture looks down on racists.
  - shakes 15y ago
    Look, I hate racism. I grew up the midwest and saw the terrible things that racism can do to a culture. But my argument is, what does Freshdesk gain from going back and forth with @cloudgroupsyd? Beyond that, @cloudgroupsyd apologized but still they chose to bring up this quote to rabble-rouse and make personal attacks against him. We all say stupid stuff, we all make mistakes. Especially in this world of 140 characters or less. What more do they want the dude to do? Become a crusader for Freshdesk? Apologize to them in person? I'm a firm believer in forgiveness. Someone wrongs you and they apologize. What do you do? You move on. You don't write a blog post about.
    - Nrndr 15y ago
      He didn't apologized.
      - shakes 15y ago
        Really? It looked to me like he did: http://twitter.com/#!/cloudgroupsyd/status/142539414374064128 http://twitter.com/#!/cloudgroupsyd/status/14253941437406412... You can argue if that apology was enough or if it was a full apology. But I feel like saying "he didn't apologize" is an oversimplification.
        j45 15y ago
        I don't know. There's no apology. Just a half assed explanation. Taking my english skills, calling someone an indian cowboy, is saying indians (posers) trying to be cowboys (the real deal). Literally, figuratively, metaphorically is definitely saying more than what it's not. And it's not positive. Instead of discussing facts, @cloudgroupsys' small mindedness to discuss and expose their ignorance (and what likely shows in many other things) simply, cannot, be overlooked.

mfjordvald 15y ago

How on earth did you get to freshdesk making personal attacks based on this page? I'm gobsmacked you managed to so severely misread the whole thing. The entire point of the page is to point out personal attacks made against them and then respond to the rip-off comment. Supposedly they did make a decent product already.

shakes 15y ago
My point is, they respond to the personal attacks by making personal attacks against the people who made them. An eye for an eye. In my opinion, they sunk down to the level of the people who were criticizing them. Making a good product speaks for itself, you don't have to have this petty back and forth.
- chairface 15y ago
  Where are the personal attacks on that page? I see none.
  - shakes 15y ago
    Taking a tweet from someone with 73 followers, throwing it front of thousands of people (maybe more) and saying that the tweet "reflects poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgement" is a personal attack to me. You can argue that they're right, but does the punishment really fit the crime? It seems in poor judgement to publicly shame some dude who's comments would of otherwise gone unnoticed.
    - shadowsun7 15y ago
      The someone with 73 followers made a racist comment. Calling a competitor "indian cowbows" does reflect poorly on the intellectual ability of the person making the judgment. Don't throw all the blame on the Freshdesk people. Everyone is responsible for what they say - and it appears to me that you're eager to let the 'someone with 73 followers' off the hook.