3 ms·
This would be cool but part of me think that most web users will just leach to watch movies in their browsers.
by papruapap 4y ago
This would be cool but part of me think that most web users will just leach to watch movies in their browsers.
- ElCheapo 4y agoProblem is: they can't watch movies in their browser because they can only leech from people who are seeding from a webtorrent client. Let's say I have a movie I want to let other people stream with their browser. I am obligated to use some javascript horror webtorrent-compatible client. If I already have a seedbox running transmission I simply cannot use that for this purpose, which is a shame
- londons_explore 4y agoSimply seeding for the 1+ hour you are watching the movie is typically enough to keep a torrent swarm healthy now that the majority of users have 10 Mbps+upload speeds. In that time, you can easily upload more data than you downloaded, meaning you are a net benefit for the swarm. In a general sense, any video content where the bitrate is lower than the typical users upload bitrate could work for a webtorrent only swarm of 'regular' users who aren't going to do anything special for network health.
- 6510 4y agoEven if you seed for a very short time is speeds up the process. No need to consume their data.
- pessimizer 4y agoOnly if they seed more than they leech. It has little to do with time. If you take a year to seed more than you leeched, you're a positive contribution to the swarm.
- 6510 4y agoIMHO the most honest comparison is to hosting the entire file yourself.