3 ms·
If it's a 128 language loop is it fair to describe it as ruby? The other 127 languages presumably have all the information so you should be able to start and e
by benj111 4y ago
If it's a 128 language loop is it fair to describe it as ruby?
The other 127 languages presumably have all the information so you should be able to start and end at any language?
I guess in its current implementation the ruby code is the code that ends the loop? But that is optional?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rdlw 4y ago> I guess in its current implementation the ruby code is the code that ends the loop I don't think so. It looks like the rc code generates the REXX code, which generates the Ruby code, which generates the Rust code.... The only thing that separates Ruby is that it's formatted into ASCII art, although it's not clear if the REXX output is similarly formatted. I can't say I've run through the cycle.