Whether a person/group is defined with the label "predator" is uninteresting. Because that is about definitions of words and categories, which has no consequenc

Whether a person/group is defined with the label "predator" is uninteresting. Because that is about definitions of words and categories, which has no consequence on policy. The right question is what policies help people, and what policies hurt people. Morally charged judgements cloud our thinking. I can easily argue that alcohol sales are predatory. They are often selling to alcoholics who are damaging their bodies. They contribute to drunk driving deaths and domestic violence. But there is no policy corollary or implication to me doing that.