4 ms·
I've never heard of Path before today - why use Path instead of Facebook/Google Plus? It seems like an instance of "Yet Another Photosharing app", which is get
by narkee 15y ago
I've never heard of Path before today - why use Path instead of Facebook/Google Plus?
It seems like an instance of "Yet Another Photosharing app", which is getting tiresome. Sometimes reading mobile development news makes it seem like photo/status sharing, and todo lists are the only things people do on mobile phones.
- simondlr 15y ago1) Great design, especially with the latest iteration. 2) Friend limit. This changes the game quite a bit. You have to be conscious about choosing whom to add, which will most likely lead to adding people you only wish to share with. 3) Taking this into account, you will be more inclined to share things with people that would care to interact with it. On Facebook it would be stupid to say you are awake, or asleep, but on Path it makes more sense, because you are sharing with the people you care to share with. P.S. Anyone have an HTC Wildfire? I've tried installing it, but it doesn't work although the minimum is specified as 2.1 on the market?
- nchuhoai 15y agoI'm not a big fan of the friend limit. If your concern is that you share too much with people you don't like than a simpler solution than resorting to another service would be to unfriend those people or make a list with people you care about
- foobarbazetc 15y agoThere's absolutely no reason what so ever to use Path. It's like... well... this looks good on a superficial basis, but what is it for? And that's why they're not going anywhere.