3 ms·
> does not come with the problems of consuming fish What kind of problems do mean? Environmental? Or health-related problems?
by vatican_banker 4y ago
> does not come with the problems of consuming fish
What kind of problems do mean? Environmental? Or health-related problems?
- hervature 4y agoBoth, heavy metals in the fish and unsustainable fishing practices.
- webnrrd2k 4y agoThats true for most fish, but not all -- sardines have much lower levels of heavy metals, and are gererally more sudtainable. Canned sardines have been a cheap, easy way to add health fish to my diet, with (relative to salmon, etc...) has minimal environment impact.
- adrianN 4y agoIt's of course true that eating apex predators like tuna is worse than eating sardines, but by fishing sardines you're greatly reducing the available food for species that eat sardines. The fundamental problem that we take out too much fish remains. That's also why krill oil is only a little better than fish oil: krill is an important part of the food chain and we're fishing too much of it.
- eurasiantiger 4y agoAlso microplastics, dioxins…
- herbst 4y agoThere is no or very little locally sourced fish for a huge portion of the population too. Fish can't be the final solution