3 ms·
GP suggests we use pricing to control water use. This means a new per-gallon cost. E.g. consider a farm drawing water from a well. Yes - they do pay to maintai
by advisedwang 4y ago
GP suggests we use pricing to control water use. This means a new per-gallon cost.
E.g. consider a farm drawing water from a well. Yes - they do pay to maintain that well, but they don't have a pricing mechanism incentivising them to draw less water based on watershed-wide supply.
To implement a pricing system to allocate water usage instead of water rights, we'd need to go and add a meter to that farm's well and then charge them a price that fluctuates depending on the supply-demand point of the watershed as a whole. that is a whole new charge, and the farm would end up paying more.
I'm not saying this is bad. Someone is going to lose out from the supply constraint. I'm just trying to work out the politics of it.
- lazide 4y agoIn many cases it also makes no sense. Wells tap aquifers. Aquifers are often highly local and not equivalent to a watershed (which is surface water and precipitation). Depending on local geology, the aquifer being tapped could even be completely isolated from the watershed!