4 ms·
Why should there be?
by bagels 4y ago
Why should there be?
- mhh__ 4y agoThe next Apollo 13 will probably be a software problem , doesn't hurt if they can read up about it
- tablespoon 4y ago> The next Apollo 13 will probably be a software problem , doesn't hurt if they can read up about it What good would an "offline backup of Wikipedia" do in that situation? Wikipedia is good for one thing, and one thing only: getting some cursory knowledge on a topic you're unfamiliar with. It's the tourist map to the "sum of all human knowledge." If you expect to use it for anything else, you're asking too much of it.
- mjcohen 4y agoI have found a lot of the math articles to be quite good.
- PaulDavisThe1st 4y agoSo, stackoverflow, not wikipedia, then?
- bagels 4y agoYou're proposing that if something goes wrong on the ISS, the crew will need wikipedia to solve it? Not... talking to Houston or just taking the Soyuz back?
- mhh__ 4y agoI wrote a crap SDR basically just from wikipedia, maybe their radio broke. Presumably you have seen a science fiction film before, use your imagination.
- kragen 4y agoSo its contents aren't lost if Earth's surface gets depopulated.
- titoCA321 4y agoAnd what's the point of it in space? Knowledge doesn't disappear when it's not on wikipedia. If humans are still around they will continue contributing to knowledge. Just because it's not printed or recorded doesn't mean that information or knowledge doesn't exist.
- mynameisvlad 4y ago> if Earth's surface gets depopulated There are 14 people on the ISS. If they were the only ones left, they would certainly not have the breadth knowledge of a Wikipedia dump.
- samatman 4y agoPutting it on ISS wouldn't help with that, although I'm sure this comes as no surprise to you, given that its orbit is a decaying one. I like the idea of periodic Wikipedia moonshots, although the storage format is kind of an open question, I've wondered for awhile if a DVD made from e.g. quartz, platinum, and titanium might be up to the job. A full backup would fit on 12 double-layer, single-sided disks; I'm being conservative and not using Blu-Ray numbers, since density and longevity are always somewhat in tension. Probably more expensive to put them safely on the moon than to manufacture in the first place.