4 ms·
Nobody said "nuclear is an existential funding threat to renewables". You made that up from whole cloth. Stop doing that.
by ncmncm 4y ago
Nobody said "nuclear is an existential funding threat to renewables". You made that up from whole cloth.
Stop doing that.
- Apocryphon 4y agoYou are the one claiming that any money into nuclear funding detracts from funding of renewables. If that in fact is not an existential threat, then you should probably tone down your verbose vehemence to the former. If it is not an existential threat, then you are thundering against a non-issue. You stop doing that.
- ncmncm 4y agoI am not, in fact "thundering". You made that up. Stop it. I said nothing about "existential threats" or "threats" of any kind. You made that up. Stop it. Every last dollar going into fraudulent fusion startups, and via federal grants from taxes into constructing ITER, is in fact diverted from potentially productive research. Fraud is a pure negative.
- Apocryphon 4y agoOkay, so you’re saying something can be a pure negative, while not being an existential threat. Thank you for explaining your position.