4 ms·
that’s one way, yes, but it relies on DNSLB, which necessitates shorter TTLs, which means more round trips to DNS. the smooth way to do this (how Google and ot
by sgammon 4y ago
that’s one way, yes, but it relies on DNSLB, which necessitates shorter TTLs, which means more round trips to DNS.
the smooth way to do this (how Google and others do it, the big boys) is via Anycast routing, where you are IP-routed to the nearest available node (I.e. all nodes globally share an external IP identity and so DNS is not driving LB or routing).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast
edit: i should say, DNSLB needs shorter TTLs, lots of monitoring, and you're already in reactive mode, but otherwise it is a great solution.