> Still others raise an eyebrow at the large number of games he has played in recent years that get a score of nearly perfect from computer analysis. This has

> Still others raise an eyebrow at the large number of games he has played in recent years that get a score of nearly perfect from computer analysis. This has been debunked (just google it), and this confirms for me that this is very shallow journalism. It's also wrong - the charge was that his score was 'perfect' (100%) across too many games, not 'nearly perfect'.