4 ms·

For me, I already own a number of headphones/earbuds that I really like for different situations. They all "just work" when you plug them in. I don't have to wo

For me, I already own a number of headphones/earbuds that I really like for different situations. They all "just work" when you plug them in. I don't have to worry about the headphones running out of batteries, and don't have to worry about additional power draw from using headphones when I have to stretch battery life for whatever reason, e.g. backpacking or in an emergency or if I just forgot to charge my phone. I don't have to buy new headphones regularly. Bluetooth has gotten better over the years but it's certainly still buggy, at least with Android. I don't like the environmental impact of buying unnecessary electronics, particularly battery-powered ones, constantly just to be able listen to music. I like technology that can "just work" every time without the constraints or anxiety. I don't like having wireless transmitters directly on my head or in my ear when it can be easily avoided, even if I know they are low power. I am lucky that I could afford the added cost of wireless headphones if I wanted them, but with billions of people not able to afford basic expenses and phones increasingly required to live a life these days, it seems fairly cynical to industry-wide remove an obvious cheap feature and force everyone to much higher-cost and higher-resource consumption technology. Yes I acknowledge the Pixel line is not a budget item, I just mean for this type of change in general.

BizarroLand 4y ago
Do you have anything against USB-C to 3.5 adapters? They're pretty cheap, it wouldn't be a huge stretch to buy one for every pair of headphones you regularly use. https://www.ebay.com/itm/324680368007 https://www.ebay.com/itm/324680368007 is one that looks like it would do the job.
- cypherpunks01 4y ago
  Yeah, nothing extreme against those adapters, that will certainly be the way to go for me if I end up with a phone without headphone jack. I just don't love how they stick out and can snag things more easily in my pocket or bag, but I'd probably put up with it. How long until USB-C is discontinued and all phones are zero port?
  - amrocha 4y ago
    For what it's worth, I went through the same internal debate, and bought a pixel with the Apple adapter since it was highly recommended. The adapter is awful, my headphones randomly stop working if I move too much, I constantly have to plug it on and off again, etc. Yeah, it's probably because I damaged it, but with the way it dangles off the phone and snags on everything there's no way it wasn't gonna get damaged.
- toastercat 4y ago
  I actually found out the hard way that a lot of these adapters are trash and completely ruin the audio signal, or don't work with all devices due to the lack of a DAC or just having a bad quality DAC. Unfortunately, if you want to buy a good and reliable one, you should probably spend at least $15-$20 on one. I've had luck with the Anker-branded one, though the audio quality is noticeably worse than when I used a phone with a direct 3.5mm port. YMMV.
- Timshel 4y ago
  Initially though that the connection was stronger on the jack port than the usb-c but they appear to be quite similar and searching for rating they are both around 10k cycles. Still I probably put more strain on the jack port than the usb-c, when used only for charging, so if the first one fails at least it does not brick my device. And i can still charge while listening to music :). Edit: probably would not buy the adapter you linked put even more strain on the port but corded one exists.

BizarroLand 4y ago

Do you have anything against USB-C to 3.5 adapters? They're pretty cheap, it wouldn't be a huge stretch to buy one for every pair of headphones you regularly use. https://www.ebay.com/itm/324680368007 https://www.ebay.com/itm/324680368007 is one that looks like it would do the job.

cypherpunks01 4y ago
Yeah, nothing extreme against those adapters, that will certainly be the way to go for me if I end up with a phone without headphone jack. I just don't love how they stick out and can snag things more easily in my pocket or bag, but I'd probably put up with it. How long until USB-C is discontinued and all phones are zero port?
- amrocha 4y ago
  For what it's worth, I went through the same internal debate, and bought a pixel with the Apple adapter since it was highly recommended. The adapter is awful, my headphones randomly stop working if I move too much, I constantly have to plug it on and off again, etc. Yeah, it's probably because I damaged it, but with the way it dangles off the phone and snags on everything there's no way it wasn't gonna get damaged.
toastercat 4y ago
I actually found out the hard way that a lot of these adapters are trash and completely ruin the audio signal, or don't work with all devices due to the lack of a DAC or just having a bad quality DAC. Unfortunately, if you want to buy a good and reliable one, you should probably spend at least $15-$20 on one. I've had luck with the Anker-branded one, though the audio quality is noticeably worse than when I used a phone with a direct 3.5mm port. YMMV.
Timshel 4y ago
Initially though that the connection was stronger on the jack port than the usb-c but they appear to be quite similar and searching for rating they are both around 10k cycles. Still I probably put more strain on the jack port than the usb-c, when used only for charging, so if the first one fails at least it does not brick my device. And i can still charge while listening to music :). Edit: probably would not buy the adapter you linked put even more strain on the port but corded one exists.