I agree with you and was saddened to see such a comment rise to the top. I don't hold that GPs opinion is wrong, in fact I have no firm views yet on the AI and

I agree with you and was saddened to see such a comment rise to the top. I don't hold that GPs opinion is wrong, in fact I have no firm views yet on the AI and would generally lean towards stuff being made available even when harmful. But the idea that people in the field of AI Ethics are all some woke SJW cabal designed to keep Google powerful is for the birds. Like all industry adjacent fields I'm sure there's some corporate capture of research in the field, but maybe, engaging with things in good faith, there are ethical questions about a powerful new technology that can replicate biases in its training data at unprecedented speed and quality?