4 ms·
> That said, it's clearly not racial based, because you can take a look at various non-American black populations and see big differences in educational levels
by marcusverus 4y ago
> That said, it's clearly not racial based, because you can take a look at various non-American black populations and see big differences in educational levels and cultural values.
There are big differences in educational levels and cultural views within every racial group. Is that relevant to the question of whether there are significant mean differences between racial groups on the population level?
- dqpb 4y agoFirst you have to define a sensible racial grouping. Good luck.
- marcusverus 4y agoHuh? Sensible racial grouping is trivial. The overwhelming majority of people on earth fall neatly into racial cateogies of white (European), black (African), Native American (American Indian), or Pacific Islander. Sure, the edges are fuzzy, (and good luck with the whole race/ethnicity thing vis-a-vis hispanics) but to pretend that makes it difficult to measuring population-level averages is just silly.
- dqpb 4y ago> Sure, the edges are fuzzy Handwave of the century
- marcusverus 4y agoIt's much easier to offer up a flippant rhetorical parry than to actually make an argument. Cognitive dissonance and all that. Here's a question: How is it that we're able to measure the degree to which various racial minorities are underrepresented in congress, in colleges, in industry and in Emmy Award nominations? How is it that we're able to measure racial disparities in income, in COVID exposure, in medical outcomes and in every other conceivable context, if race is such a tricky concept to nail down?