3 ms·
Unless you mean "specific tattoos", having no tattoos is probably more anomalous for people under a certain age. I would the cutoff is within the broad range of
by jollyllama 4y ago
Unless you mean "specific tattoos", having no tattoos is probably more anomalous for people under a certain age. I would the cutoff is within the broad range of 35-50.
- kragen 4y agoAs I said, it depends on where you live. Here in Argentina having no tattoos is more anomalous than having them for people in the 35–50 range, just as you say; but in Japan they mark you as a criminal, in Iran they're a symbol of rejection of the theocracy, in PRC it's illegal to show them on TV, and Erykah Badu is banned from performing in Malaysia because she has "Allah" tattooed across her shoulders. Both the Yazidis and the Kurds have tattoo traditions that have at times been persecuted by Daesh, Iran, and Turkey; I don't know how active that phenomenon is at the moment.
- jollyllama 4y agoVery true.