6 ms·

Here's a sped-up video showing him in action: https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1577731089602265089 https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1577731089602265089 A

by crummy 4y ago

Here's a sped-up video showing him in action: https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1577731089602265089 https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1577731089602265089 Absurd to see that kind of detail emerge like that.

porbelm 4y ago
Holy crap, not a single line of sketchwork! Amazing.
- skohan 4y ago
  Yeah it's unreal. And the result is so well-proportioned and 3-dimensional as well. I wonder how much of it was in his mind before he started, and how much was about figuring out what would fit along the way.
  - belfalas 4y ago
    I can't remember the source, but I remember learning that his specialty was 5-point perspective and he could keep most of the drawing visualized in his mind before he even started. But he also improvised a lot and made decisions on the fly. Unreal is definitely the right word, similar to watching Michael Jordan at his best.
loceng 4y ago
He died of heart issue based on some replies to that tweet?
- canadiantim 4y ago
  - relativeadv 4y ago
    "Makes you wonder for sure" What are we talking about here?
    - logicalmonster 4y ago
    - loceng 4y ago
      - lupire 4y ago
        It's on Google https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bangkok%20Thailand%20study%20on%2012%2D18%20year%20old%20boys%20looking%20for%20pre%2D%20and%20post%2D%20signs%20of%20myocarditis%20and%20pericarditi https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bangkok%20Thailand%20s...
        loceng 4y ago
        Not with honest articles at the top, see my reply here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33108401 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33108401
      - thieving_magpie 4y ago
        I googled it (plenty of results...) and this was the basic analysis I found: "The study of teenagers in Thailand following a second COVID-19 vaccination found that 18% -- not one third -- experienced any detectable cardiac effect, and that 1 in 301, not 1 in 43, had confirmed myocarditis. A large proportion of purported abnormalities detected by testing were without symptoms, and 100% of the teens in the study fully recovered after 14 days, the authors reported." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccin... I'm not knowledgeable enough about anything regarding this subject to make any determinations about if that is being downplayed or misleading. I don't want to pretend like I understand it.
        loceng 4y ago
        This Reuters article is disingenuous at best. They're downplaying the harm by changing the context. Re: "found that 18% -- not one third -- experienced any detectable cardiac effect" This research found 1:43 harm - because that harm included detection of damage to the heart via blood: "Troponin blood test - troponin is a protein which is released into the blood stream when the heart muscle is damaged. The troponin level provides a quick and accurate measure of any heart muscle damage. It's used to help in the assessment following suspected heart attack." Troponin was part of the research - and in 1:43 trooponin was detected post-shot vs. pre-shot. And 1:301 is still extremely bad, no? Certainly you can make a judgement on that? It is actually harming 1:43 but even harming a heart - which is permanent damage as the heart doesn't heal - 1:301 of harming a young person's heart is completely unacceptable - especially when they're at very little risk of any significant harm, nowhere near 1:301 from COVID itself. Also, 100% of the teens didn't recover after 14 days: there is permanent heart damage in 1:43. They also focus on only including myocarditis numbers to make their numbers seem less worse (1:301 is still horrific) - by excluding the case(s) of pericarditis from their numbers. Notice how Reuters is at the top of Google, and Reuters has routinely misled people to train them of these shallow-narrow talking points - to give them enough narrative to make them think the alarming research was less true than it actually is.
  - loceng 4y ago
    [flagged]
  - lupire 4y ago
    My uncle died of heart attack at age 40...40years ago.
permo-w 4y ago
what’s going with twitter’s mobile video player (on safari). literally no way to just watch the video without it being half obscured with the tweet it’s attached to
uup 4y ago
That guy has a really good sense of proportion.

by crummy 4y ago

porbelm 4y ago

Holy crap, not a single line of sketchwork! Amazing.

skohan 4y ago
Yeah it's unreal. And the result is so well-proportioned and 3-dimensional as well. I wonder how much of it was in his mind before he started, and how much was about figuring out what would fit along the way.
- belfalas 4y ago
  I can't remember the source, but I remember learning that his specialty was 5-point perspective and he could keep most of the drawing visualized in his mind before he even started. But he also improvised a lot and made decisions on the fly. Unreal is definitely the right word, similar to watching Michael Jordan at his best.

loceng 4y ago

He died of heart issue based on some replies to that tweet?

canadiantim 4y ago
- relativeadv 4y ago
  "Makes you wonder for sure" What are we talking about here?
  - logicalmonster 4y ago
  - loceng 4y ago
    - lupire 4y ago
      It's on Google https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bangkok%20Thailand%20study%20on%2012%2D18%20year%20old%20boys%20looking%20for%20pre%2D%20and%20post%2D%20signs%20of%20myocarditis%20and%20pericarditi https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bangkok%20Thailand%20s...
      - loceng 4y ago
        Not with honest articles at the top, see my reply here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33108401 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33108401
    - thieving_magpie 4y ago
      I googled it (plenty of results...) and this was the basic analysis I found: "The study of teenagers in Thailand following a second COVID-19 vaccination found that 18% -- not one third -- experienced any detectable cardiac effect, and that 1 in 301, not 1 in 43, had confirmed myocarditis. A large proportion of purported abnormalities detected by testing were without symptoms, and 100% of the teens in the study fully recovered after 14 days, the authors reported." https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccine/fact-check-study-of-thai-teenagers-did-not-find-one-third-experienced-heart-effects-after-covid-vaccination-idUSL1N2ZT2B5 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-heart-teens-vaccin... I'm not knowledgeable enough about anything regarding this subject to make any determinations about if that is being downplayed or misleading. I don't want to pretend like I understand it.
      - loceng 4y ago
        This Reuters article is disingenuous at best. They're downplaying the harm by changing the context. Re: "found that 18% -- not one third -- experienced any detectable cardiac effect" This research found 1:43 harm - because that harm included detection of damage to the heart via blood: "Troponin blood test - troponin is a protein which is released into the blood stream when the heart muscle is damaged. The troponin level provides a quick and accurate measure of any heart muscle damage. It's used to help in the assessment following suspected heart attack." Troponin was part of the research - and in 1:43 trooponin was detected post-shot vs. pre-shot. And 1:301 is still extremely bad, no? Certainly you can make a judgement on that? It is actually harming 1:43 but even harming a heart - which is permanent damage as the heart doesn't heal - 1:301 of harming a young person's heart is completely unacceptable - especially when they're at very little risk of any significant harm, nowhere near 1:301 from COVID itself. Also, 100% of the teens didn't recover after 14 days: there is permanent heart damage in 1:43. They also focus on only including myocarditis numbers to make their numbers seem less worse (1:301 is still horrific) - by excluding the case(s) of pericarditis from their numbers. Notice how Reuters is at the top of Google, and Reuters has routinely misled people to train them of these shallow-narrow talking points - to give them enough narrative to make them think the alarming research was less true than it actually is.
- loceng 4y ago
  [flagged]
- lupire 4y ago
  My uncle died of heart attack at age 40...40years ago.

permo-w 4y ago

what’s going with twitter’s mobile video player (on safari). literally no way to just watch the video without it being half obscured with the tweet it’s attached to

uup 4y ago

That guy has a really good sense of proportion.