2 ms·
Reading that statement by Konnech, I am struck how brazen the NYT was. Given two opposing statements, they simply decided which one debunks the other, and passe
by tarakat 4y ago
Reading that statement by Konnech, I am struck how brazen the NYT was. Given two opposing statements, they simply decided which one debunks the other, and passed it off as fact.
I wonder how many other instances of this there are in their other reporting, where reasonable accusations or suspicions are "debunked" simply by the accused stating "nu-uh".
- tootie 4y agoThe article says there's no evidence and at the time there wasn't. In fact, we still don't have any evidence available to the press. An arrest isn't proof of guilt. It's unclear if whoever started the rumor online had insider information that lead the arrest.