4 ms·
What are you planning to move to?
by ec109685 4y ago
What are you planning to move to?
- flounder3 4y agoSounds crazy, but Datadog. I’ve been hammering their product teams for years with specific use cases for the sole purpose of replacing Splunk. They recently migrated search technologies and are rapidly closing the gap. Plus, their exclusion features are instant and fantastic, and their C-suite replies to me when I escalate. Elasticsearch simply couldn’t handle key collisions. We have hundreds of various apps across 5-10 different languages and frameworks where a key name may be reused as either a string or a hash or an integer or an array. If we can’t freeform search (which Splunk is EXCELLENT at), we just need to be able to transform the data beforehand. Datadog plans to do so with their recent acquisition of Vector.
- david38 4y agoSounds crazy indeed. I worked at Splunk for many years and was a DataDog customer later. The costs of either are not something I care to deal with.
- rsdbdr203 4y agoWould love to know more about specific use-cases you've been talking to Datadog about. I'm starting a company (log-store.com) that I pitch to people as 75% of the features of Splunk at 50% the price. Right now that 75% is probably more like 25%, and the 50% is _actually_ 0%... it's FREE! Any and all feedback is greatly appreciated!
- ec109685 4y agoSad. Splunk should be more fantastic. They have done the heavy lifting of taking streams of data at high volume, which should be the basis to build a log search product, metrics And alerting, and observability. Instead, each of these systems have their own collectors and correlating from one to the other is hard. A canonical log line is so much more valuable than a metric collected every 60 seconds, and the former can derive the latter: https://stripe.com/blog/canonical-log-lines https://stripe.com/blog/canonical-log-lines Splunk should have been the lynchpin.
- flounder3 4y agoAbsolutely agree. It’s tragic. Shoving SignalFx down our mouths and trying to get us to create “metric” indices was the straw that broke my back.
- jcims 4y agoI built a PCI compliance solution for a customer back in 2008 for ~$200k all-in when the closest competitor's bid was five times that. The product was amazing at runtime but of course had some idiosyncrasies in how it was configured and whatnot. I've been a user (only) of Splunk heavily ever since and just last year got pulled into a project to migrate a huge install to a cloud platform. It felt like I got into a time machine...there were seemingly zero administrative or architectural improvements to make the product more manageable or supportable in the 10+ years since I had last looked at it from an ops perspective. I'm sure that's not 100% true but it felt like it. Trying to build Splunk on top of a modern IaC deployment methodology is a huuuuge lift.
- ec109685 4y agoYeah, team decided K8s for Splunk would be too much work and ended up needing to use vanilla VM’s with block storage on an open stack env on prem. Pretty lame not cloud native.
- fillskills 4y agoYou might also want to review NewRelic. Their new plans allow for lots of data ingestion at low price including logs.
- jollofricepeas 4y agoExactly. This is the question. If you’re looking for APM well you’ve got great options but for those using Splunk in the security space (SIEM & SOAR) you’re screwed. There’s no better SIEM alternative that deals with logs at scale. Splunk recently screwed a friends Fortune 50 company. They didn't pay a bill on time (renewal negotiations) and Splunk without even contacting them just left all the logs from one of their instances on the floor. They lost everything for literally an entire country. I mean EVERYTHING.
- flounder3 4y agoLol, this is exactly what I was referring to! We were negotiating a massive renewal (50x budget IN EARNEST!) and out of nowhere they threatened to cut us off with less than 24 hours notice because we were a week behind their schedule, despite signed agreements. Thankfully our VAR (a longtime partner) jumped in and cut a PO to vouch for us and our word. NONE of our other vendors have EVER done that shit in my entire career. EVER. My word means nothing to them; they act like a pure private equity player now.
- nicolas_t 4y agoLol, I could have written exactly the same comments you did about Splunk. I'm the one who decided to start using splunk for our company 8 years ago, we're working on migrating away and I will never under any circumstances consider recommending splunk for any future companies I work for.
- flounder3 4y agoI can truly empathize. I’ve never wasted so much of my time on a vendor. It’s infuriating and certainly not worth the personal stress and agony. It shouldn’t be this hard!
- buffet_overflow 4y agoCan echo the licensing sentiments across 2 companies now. It's a shame because I grew to really like SPL and how Splunk handled web based distributed search. What are you moving towards now, if I may ask?
- kordlessagain 4y agoEx-splunker here. I just started working at FeatureBase and would say, if your data is in Kafka, FeatureBase might be something to consider. It’s a crazy fast binary index built on Roaring bitmaps.