4 ms·
Team Cymru (the company the article is about) has a response to the coverage: https://www.team-cymru.com/post/team-cymru-myth-vs-fact https://www.team-cymru.com
by csande17 4y ago
Team Cymru (the company the article is about) has a response to the coverage: https://www.team-cymru.com/post/team-cymru-myth-vs-fact https://www.team-cymru.com/post/team-cymru-myth-vs-fact
In short, they claim that:
- The "PCAP" data, email addresses, etc that they sell comes from them running malware samples on their own infrastructure. It's not based on captured Internet data.
- The web page addresses etc that they sell are the results of automated vulnerability scans and honeypots, not captured Internet data.
- The netflow data they sell is captured from real ISP traffic, but it is a small sample (only 1 in 10,000 netflows is captured), and it can't identify individual websites if they use a CDN or shared hosting infrastructure (which most websites do).
I have no clue how true these claims are, but those are the claims.
- cma 4y agoWouldn't captured netflow data show which tor nodes users were connected to?
- _8j50 4y agoOnly entry guards which isn't secret info. You will need to get very lucky to correlate that with relay traffic with the guard. Even with decent 1:10 sampling I would say it us only a little better than a random guess at best.