3 ms·
Perhaps it's "more chocolatey" because they replaced the "chocolate" (which I believe has some regulations around actually containing cocoa butter) with "chocol
by dunham 4y ago
Perhaps it's "more chocolatey" because they replaced the "chocolate" (which I believe has some regulations around actually containing cocoa butter) with "chocolatey" (which, by not claiming to be chocolate, can just be flavoring).
- babyshake 4y agoNow featuring 100% chocolate! By which we mean synthetic flavors provided by "100% Chocolate Incorporated"
- dunham 4y agoBut there are regulations restricting the use of the word chocolate, so they say "chocolatey": https://consumerist.com/2016/02/10/why-do-new-starbucks-drinks-have-chocolatey-chips-not-chocolate/ https://consumerist.com/2016/02/10/why-do-new-starbucks-drin... (This is in the US, but I wouldn't be surprised if the EU has stronger rules.)
- nsxwolf 4y agoFrom the article: > “chocoriffic” (no one actually uses that one, but maybe they should.) The author is blissfully unaware of a vile concoction made by Dean's called "Choco-Riffic!", which I used to think contained neither milk nor chocolate, but apparently does after reading the label - there's at least some milk, and cocoa.