2 ms·
Can't reply to your reply, it's too deeply nested. Even better than a VPS with multiple services is (IMO) a container per service. So you get a nice clear sin
by sliken 4y ago
Can't reply to your reply, it's too deeply nested.
Even better than a VPS with multiple services is (IMO) a container per service. So you get a nice clear single function container, but don't have to pay the memory and performance overhead of having a VPS per service.
Containers have zero memory/performance overhead (it's based on cgroups, which normal linux processes have anyways), minimal disk overhead (not need for an OS install for each one), and saves a ton of ram (each VPS requires at least a linux kernel).