4 ms·
You may want to familiarize yourself with this thought experiment and think how a slightly modified version applies to AIs and their output: https://en.wikipedi
by trention 4y ago
You may want to familiarize yourself with this thought experiment and think how a slightly modified version applies to AIs and their output:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_machine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_machine
As to whether I am an outlier:
Hundreds of thousands of people worldwide watch Magnus Carlsen. How many have watched AlphaZero play chess when it came about and how many watch it when it ceased to be a novelty?
- CuriouslyC 4y agoTotally different. Watching a display of skill, where you marvel at how much better the demonstrator is than yourself obviously has no value if the demonstrator is a machine, but then it is plainly visible that the activity has little intrinsic entertainment value and entertainment value comes from the story and personal arc of the performer. This is different from a movie where nobody really cares about the personal arc of the actor, and people are completely happy to watch an animated film where there isn't even a real actor on display.
- trention 4y ago>where nobody really cares about the personal arc of the actor Speak for yourself. Actors do have fans, and a lot of them. Their personal lives are subjects of interest for a reason. So, no, not totally different at all.