3 ms·
The term "creative" is so pretentious, as if only content generation involves creativity. Your post reminds me of all the photographers that said digital photo
by colordrops 4y ago
The term "creative" is so pretentious, as if only content generation involves creativity.
Your post reminds me of all the photographers that said digital photography would remain niche and never replace film.
The current models are toys made by small groups. It's not hard to imagine AI generated film being much more compelling when the entire industry of engineers and "creatives" refine and evolve the ecosystem to take into account subtle strokes, wrinkles, movement, shots etc. And they will, because it will be cheaper, and businesses always go for cheaper.
- dagmx 4y agoWhy is it any more pretentious than “developer” or “engineer”? Also businesses don’t always go for cheaper. They go for maximum ROI. I’ve worked on tons of marvel films for example, and I quite well know where AI fits and speeds things up. I also know where client studios will pay a pretty penny for more art directed results rather than going for the cheapest vendor.
- colordrops 4y ago"Engineer" usage is quite broad. Developer, less so, but you do see it with housing, device manufacturers, social programs, etc as well, and it's not relegated only to software, despite widespread usage. But you'll never hear anyone call a software engineer or device manufacturer a "creative". Re: cheaper vs ROI, I agree, that was basically the point I was trying to get across. I do understand your point and think it will be a long while before auto-generated content becomes mainstream, but it it's entirely possible and reasonable to expect within our near term lifetimes.
- AndrewUnmuted 4y ago