18 ms·
IMO, since Apple's public, it would dig too deeply into Apple's short-term profitability and growth, making it a no-go for its voting shareholders.
by falcolas 4y ago
IMO, since Apple's public, it would dig too deeply into Apple's short-term profitability and growth, making it a no-go for its voting shareholders.
- javajosh 4y agoPut it to a vote.
- adra 4y agoRich people hold most of the shares and they don't want people to know that they're just as self-centered as the rest of us (likely more which is partially what inflated their coffers to begin with, but that's just subjective assumptions).
- ryeights 4y agoTime to put the ESG/political posturing of major financial firms to the test, I suppose?
- vineyardmike 4y ago> Time to put the ESG/political posturing of major financial firms to the test, I suppose? Fastest way to end ESG posturing I suppose. Although ESG concerns don’t typically include “made in America”. It’s not clear to me how that’s be an ESG thing.