3 ms·
How is it nonsense? Either the machete is moving according to signals picked up from the plant, or it's not. Are you asserting that the voltages sensed are jus
by ncmncm 4y ago
How is it nonsense? Either the machete is moving according to signals picked up from the plant, or it's not.
Are you asserting that the voltages sensed are just random noise, and do not represent internal potentials? Or just that the plant is not deliberately waving around a knife?
Plants do exhibit electrical potential changes in response to environmental and internal stimuli. It would be surprising if those vary as dramatically as the exhibit suggests, but not physiologically implausible.
Plants do not have separate nerve tissue crammed together into a skull to minimize signal transit time as needed to respond in millisecond increments, as animals must, but they certainly do have cells distributed throughout that could respond as nerve cells do, given connectivity and stimuli, on a slower timebase. We don't know if there are such connections or responses. Each plant taxon might vary substantially from others, in this detail, so not finding it in pea plants does not tell you anything about philodendrons.
Proving its absence in peas could be arbitrarily difficult.
- m000 4y agoThe "essentially the plant is the brain" part is super-sensationalized nonsense. To the extent of the information provided, the robotic arm is just a visualizer of the electrical activity of the plant. And the machete is there only for the extra clicks.
- ncmncm 4y agoIt is an art installation. Every last detail of every art installation is "for clicks" (where not just for kicks).