2 ms·

Name one "Western" country that was democratic, really, for more than 40 years during WWI That "really" gives you a lot of wiggle room to move the goalposts, s

by tremon 4y ago

Name one "Western" country that was democratic, really, for more than 40 years during WWI That "really" gives you a lot of wiggle room to move the goalposts, since before WWI women generally weren't allowed to vote, and in many countries voting was mainly limited to the aristocracy (or other criteria). So there were no "real" late-20th century democracies anywhere in the 19th century. The closest you can get to are a few constitutional monarchies See, you're moving the goalposts already. Why would constitutional monarchies not qualify as "real"? So, taking the same wiggle room you have allowed yourself, there's the United Kingdom (1689), Sweden (1809), Spain (1812), Norway (1814), The Netherlands (1815), Belgium (1831), Switzerland (1848), and Portugal (1852).

sofixa 4y ago
> See, you're moving the goalposts already. Why would constitutional monarchies not qualify as "real"? My next sentence explains why: > monarchies with at least lots of de jure, usually also de facto monarch power Having an unelected head of state with lots of power isn't a "real" democracy, in my book. Places where the monarch could appoint a government and dissolve parliament at will, directly own colonies for personal exploitation, etc. were hardly "really" democratic, which excludes more than half your list (Spain depending on time of year, Portugal, Belgium, Netherlands,, UK, and I can't be bothered to look but fairly sure also Norway, Sweden, Denmark). I already mentioned Switzerland, which wasn't a monarchy (at the federal level), but yes, was democratic. There's also San Marino.