3 ms·
What does he mean by: > >> I definitely had no plans to backport any of that stuff, > >> but I guess the automagics did it anyway. > >> Looks like stable is at
by jonp888 4y ago
What does he mean by:
> >> I definitely had no plans to backport any of that stuff,
> >> but I guess the automagics did it anyway.
> >> Looks like stable is at least missing this pile of stuff:
Did a half-finished feature end up in the release due to an automatic merge?
- cesarb 4y agoBy "automagics" he probably means the artificial intelligence bot which tries to guess which commits should be backported to the "stable" (in this case, 5.19.x with x other than 0) kernel, even though they have not been explicitly marked to be backported. That bot has been controversial for some time, see for instance the article at https://lwn.net/Articles/863505/ https://lwn.net/Articles/863505/ and the older articles it links to.
- bentcorner 4y agoThat's.. an interesting approach. I can understand why they want to have a bot help out but personally I'd feel very wary of a bot selecting commits to merge. In my completely uninformed opinion it sounds like there's process improvements that could be made alongside using the bot to point out interesting commits that can be reviewed by a human. Here's an article about the machine learning bits: https://lwn.net/Articles/764647/ https://lwn.net/Articles/764647/