4 ms·
> there's absolutely no safety mindset for anything behind the cover. As a counter-point: One persons "safety" is another persons "limitation". Sometimes it's
by capableweb 4y ago
> there's absolutely no safety mindset for anything behind the cover.
As a counter-point: One persons "safety" is another persons "limitation". Sometimes it's good that things are generally protected but you can break through the protections somewhat.
- pas 4y agoI'm not advocating for filling out the whole insides with epoxy. (Quite the contrary, I think it'd be great to have better markings on components, and have data sheets - and schematics - for them readily available. I mean it's ridiculous that the whole IP protection legal machinery is justified in the name of incentivizing invention and new works, but in practice all we got is cheaper and cheaper copies/derivatives of the same noname things.)
- collegeburner 4y agofacts, if there was a regulator some hackernews would be on here complaining about how it's "not hackable" or whatever.