3 ms·
I think I understand where you're coming from, and largely agree. Regarding societal weakness/insecurity stemming from disconnecting technologies, I view that
by mkmk3 4y ago
I think I understand where you're coming from, and largely agree.
Regarding societal weakness/insecurity stemming from disconnecting technologies, I view that as something that's happened to a large degree, and it shapes chunks of the modern landscape as I see it.
Technologies that help to correct that are valuable. Dependencies on others force the development of interpersonal skills, and maybe something like this discourages someone from joining an association like toastmasters or similar. That would be a shame. But on the other hand, depending on the users own flavor of neuroses it may help them feel comfortable enough or develop the interest to prompt them to do something more social. I really don't know, I could see it nudging my past selves either way.
Regardless, thanks for your response. I did need a reminder to take a wider perspective in this context, I appreciate it.
- nonrandomstring 4y agoThanks for the exchange. > depending on the users own flavor of neuroses it may help them feel comfortable enough or develop the interest to prompt them to do something more social. Absolutely. I agree this is real utility. I guess I'm concerned that these are actually outliers used to justify a more troubling project. And maybe more people have crippling anxiety disorders only treatable by machines than I care to admit. It actually reminds me of the arguments around anti-depressants as a gateway to proper therapy. I do hear you.