4 ms·
Hypothetically, Tesla would spin this story differently in no time if they are making great strides in a cheap solid-state radar. For now, though, it looks lik
by i2infinity 4y ago
Hypothetically, Tesla would spin this story differently in no time if they are making great strides in a cheap solid-state radar.
For now, though, it looks like Tesla is building a case after they decided to do away with radar. I recall EM saying that it looks ugly and expensive too. I really got confused when Telsa came up with this patent though https://twitter.com/iamkellex/status/1534240730633236480?s=20&t=4sxlpGjn13wGvG7BOlp7tA https://twitter.com/iamkellex/status/1534240730633236480?s=2...
No one sensor will work for all use cases; each has pros and cons. Radar really shines with depth sensing; it can cut through rain, fog, and snow like a hot knife through butter, much better than pure vision-based systems. At the same time, it seems to fail during harsh breaking and maybe a few other scenarios.
- KennyBlanken 4y agoThe ability to cut through rain, fog, and snow is precisely why so many companies use radar based systems - that's arguably when they are the most important and useful. Leaning further into their vision systems when their vision systems cause their cars to slam into emergency vehicles that aren't even in travel lanes, and to rear-end tractor trailers, isn't encouraging. Musk is placing the rest of us at risk and I'm sick of it.
- simondotau 4y agoHave you seen a recent video of their most recent vision stack in use by a customer?
- i2infinity 4y agoNope! Why do you ask?