people are not annoyed by anyone forking SQLite they are annoyed by people misrepresenting facts in a subtle manipulative way to make their fork and the reason

people are not annoyed by anyone forking SQLite they are annoyed by people misrepresenting facts in a subtle manipulative way to make their fork and the reasons around it look like something it isn't what the article intentionally or unintentionally conveys in its tone and formulation is: "sqlite is badly outdate beyond saving and needs to be replaced" what actually is the case: "we want something like SQLite but with some core changes incompatible with SQLites core principles which should be API compatible enough to allow reusing a lot of DB tooling".