4 ms·
That's an easy one: your product is good only for some people, who happen to have the problem you're solving. You could tell everyone about it, but you'd reac
by piotrkaminski 4y ago
That's an easy one: your product is good only for some people, who happen to have the problem you're solving. You could tell everyone about it, but you'd reach a lot of people for whom wasting time hearing about your product is a net negative, and it's entirely possible that the overall value to other people's lives of advertising in that way would be negative as well. Of course you could try more targeted advertising to mitigate the negative externalities, but that carries its own costs in terms of invasion of privacy, etc.
So yes, it's certainly possible that advertising raises the overall well-being of the recipients, but it's by no means a given.
- grantsch 4y agoWho are you to decide that though? If you don't try to reach them - your inferior competitors will. Then you and your potential users are both worse off
- piotrkaminski 4y agoYes, the tragedy of the commons. The only way to win is not to play. It may not be rational, but I refuse to do something bad just because the alternative is somebody else doing something worse.
- grantsch 4y agoIt's ok. To each his own I opt to keep growing