4 ms·

I did not miss that in my comment.

• ac2u 4y ago
  Yeah, lots of reactionary blasting of your comment from people who didn't realise your point was that in future, if the stocks aren't used, some smartass politician is going to be "see!?! we didn't need it! why should we replace the expired stuff?" and leave the stocks at a state where the usefulness for an emergency is nil. Unfortunately, there's no incentive when spending taxpayer money for the person who "buys" insurance for tail risk events.