> You can plainly see that I recognize the magic remark as sarcastic Indeed, and I stated such :) > so what is the point of your response? What is the point

> You can plainly see that I recognize the magic remark as sarcastic Indeed, and I stated such :) > so what is the point of your response? What is the point of yours? The "magical" nonexistence of footage whenever 1. there would ordinarily be footage and 2. that footage happens to record something for which someone doesn't want evidence demonstrates a pattern; that pattern is in and of itself a problem, regardless of whether it's explained by incompetence or malice. Assuming that someone else assumed malice and quibbling on that particular point is a pointless distraction from the actual problem in this case.